Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres Planning Proposal

Share Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres Planning Proposal on Facebook Share Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres Planning Proposal on Twitter Share Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres Planning Proposal on Linkedin Email Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres Planning Proposal link

This consultation is closed. On 10 December 2019, Council endorsed the Planning Proposal for the Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres and resolved to forward the proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) requesting amendments be made to Randwick LEP.  The Planning Proposal is currently with the State Government awaiting gazettal of the proposed changes to the RLEP 2012. The Planning Proposal can be viewed here.

Randwick City Council is currently conducting community consultation in relation to a planning proposal and contributions plan that affects properties located within and immediately adjoining the Kensington and Kingsford town centres.

The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (RLEP 2012) and establish a new vision for the Kensington and Kingsford town centres.

The Planning Proposal applies to areas zoned B2 Local Centre in the Kensington and Kingsford town centres, and three locations immediately adjoining the Kingsford town centre comprising 16, 18 and 20 Barker Street, 582-584 and 586-592 Anzac Parade, 63 Harbourne Road and 12, 14, 16 and 18 Rainbow Street, Kingsford.

The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the provisions of RLEP 2012 by:

  • Allowing sites within the two town centres to potentially achieve a greater height and density above existing controls (limits as specified below) if the development contributes towards community infrastructure (via a new Community Infrastructure Contribution clause in RLEP 2012);
  • Increasing building heights within the centres from 6/7 storeys to 9 storeys
    (31 metres) across the majority of the town centres;
  • Increasing building heights at two key nodes to a maximum 60 metres
    (18 stories) with demonstrated design excellence (Todman Square and Strachan St Kingsford);
  • Increasing heights to a maximum 56 metres (17 storeys with demonstrated design excellence) at the Kingsford Junction and Rainbow Street sites;
  • Increasing the FSR control to 4:1 along the majority of the sites with the town centres and up to 5:1 FSR at Todman Square, Kingsford Mid-Town and Kingsford Junction sites;
  • Rezoning the R2 Low Density Residential land at 582-584 and 586-592 Anzac Parade, Kingsford, and the R3 Medium Density Residential land at 16, 18 and 20 Barker Street, Kingsford, 12, 14, 16 and 18 Rainbow Street, Kingsford and 63 Harbourne Road, Kingsford to a B2 Local Centre zone, with a maximum FSR control of 4:1 and Height of Building control of 31 metres;
  • Introducing new provisions and guidelines for design excellence to require best practice high quality, sustainable design at the key nodes; and
  • Introducing an affordable housing levy providing up to 200 affordable housing units.

For a useful overview of the Planning Proposal read the summary booklet.

View the documents:

You can also view all documents.

The Planning Proposal Authority is Randwick City Council and the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment is the plan-making authority for the finalisation of this Planning Proposal.

Separate to this Planning Proposal package, Council is also seeking submissions on a new s.7.12 developer contributions plan which will increase the levy payable within the two town centres to fund new local infrastructure and improvements to the two town centres.

The Kensington and Kingsford Planning Proposal (K2K) proposes changes to the height and density controls. Modest height increases are proposed along the 2.5km Anzac Parade corridor with taller buildings proposed at three nodes; Todman Avenue intersection, Strachan Street intersection and the Nine-ways roundabout.

K2K is a plan to improve the Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres making them iconic destinations with vibrant, bustling streets, diverse businesses and a strong community feel. K2K is about encouraging appropriate and sustainable development and adopting a strategic and coordinated approach to create vibrant precincts where people want to live, work and visit.

You can make a submission by:

  • Completing an online submission through this site
  • Sending your comments headed "Planning Proposal - Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres" to the General Manager by email council@randwick.nsw.gov.au
  • Posting your comments headed "Planning Proposal - Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres" to the General Manager, Randwick City Council, 30 Frances Street, Randwick NSW 2031.

The Planning Proposal can be viewed in hard copy at:

  • Council’s Customer Service Centre, 30 Frances Street Randwick, between 8.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday
  • Bowen Library, 669-673 Anzac Parade, Maroubra during library hours
  • Malabar Library, 1203 Anzac Parade, Matraville during library hours
  • Randwick Library, Level 1, Royal Randwick Shopping Centre, Randwick during library hours

Consultation period: 20 August to 1 October 2019.

Randwick City Council is currently conducting community consultation in relation to a planning proposal and contributions plan that affects properties located within and immediately adjoining the Kensington and Kingsford town centres.

The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (RLEP 2012) and establish a new vision for the Kensington and Kingsford town centres.

The Planning Proposal applies to areas zoned B2 Local Centre in the Kensington and Kingsford town centres, and three locations immediately adjoining the Kingsford town centre comprising 16, 18 and 20 Barker Street, 582-584 and 586-592 Anzac Parade, 63 Harbourne Road and 12, 14, 16 and 18 Rainbow Street, Kingsford.

The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the provisions of RLEP 2012 by:

  • Allowing sites within the two town centres to potentially achieve a greater height and density above existing controls (limits as specified below) if the development contributes towards community infrastructure (via a new Community Infrastructure Contribution clause in RLEP 2012);
  • Increasing building heights within the centres from 6/7 storeys to 9 storeys
    (31 metres) across the majority of the town centres;
  • Increasing building heights at two key nodes to a maximum 60 metres
    (18 stories) with demonstrated design excellence (Todman Square and Strachan St Kingsford);
  • Increasing heights to a maximum 56 metres (17 storeys with demonstrated design excellence) at the Kingsford Junction and Rainbow Street sites;
  • Increasing the FSR control to 4:1 along the majority of the sites with the town centres and up to 5:1 FSR at Todman Square, Kingsford Mid-Town and Kingsford Junction sites;
  • Rezoning the R2 Low Density Residential land at 582-584 and 586-592 Anzac Parade, Kingsford, and the R3 Medium Density Residential land at 16, 18 and 20 Barker Street, Kingsford, 12, 14, 16 and 18 Rainbow Street, Kingsford and 63 Harbourne Road, Kingsford to a B2 Local Centre zone, with a maximum FSR control of 4:1 and Height of Building control of 31 metres;
  • Introducing new provisions and guidelines for design excellence to require best practice high quality, sustainable design at the key nodes; and
  • Introducing an affordable housing levy providing up to 200 affordable housing units.

For a useful overview of the Planning Proposal read the summary booklet.

View the documents:

You can also view all documents.

The Planning Proposal Authority is Randwick City Council and the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment is the plan-making authority for the finalisation of this Planning Proposal.

Separate to this Planning Proposal package, Council is also seeking submissions on a new s.7.12 developer contributions plan which will increase the levy payable within the two town centres to fund new local infrastructure and improvements to the two town centres.

The Kensington and Kingsford Planning Proposal (K2K) proposes changes to the height and density controls. Modest height increases are proposed along the 2.5km Anzac Parade corridor with taller buildings proposed at three nodes; Todman Avenue intersection, Strachan Street intersection and the Nine-ways roundabout.

K2K is a plan to improve the Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres making them iconic destinations with vibrant, bustling streets, diverse businesses and a strong community feel. K2K is about encouraging appropriate and sustainable development and adopting a strategic and coordinated approach to create vibrant precincts where people want to live, work and visit.

You can make a submission by:

  • Completing an online submission through this site
  • Sending your comments headed "Planning Proposal - Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres" to the General Manager by email council@randwick.nsw.gov.au
  • Posting your comments headed "Planning Proposal - Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres" to the General Manager, Randwick City Council, 30 Frances Street, Randwick NSW 2031.

The Planning Proposal can be viewed in hard copy at:

  • Council’s Customer Service Centre, 30 Frances Street Randwick, between 8.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday
  • Bowen Library, 669-673 Anzac Parade, Maroubra during library hours
  • Malabar Library, 1203 Anzac Parade, Matraville during library hours
  • Randwick Library, Level 1, Royal Randwick Shopping Centre, Randwick during library hours

Consultation period: 20 August to 1 October 2019.

This consultation is closed. On 10 December 2019, Council endorsed the Planning Proposal for the Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres and resolved to forward the proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) requesting amendments be made to Randwick LEP.  The Planning Proposal is currently with the State Government awaiting gazettal of the proposed changes to the RLEP 2012. The Planning Proposal can be viewed here.

Do you have a question about the planning proposal?  Ask us here and we will respond to you shortly. 

  • Share Why are nine pre-selected sites able to go 17 or 18 storeys whilst the properties adjacent can only go to nine? There are many strategic locations along Anzac Parade that have not had the opportunity to be considered for 17 or 18 storeys. The council’s comment in deciding on the opportunity sites in the information sheet that can go to 17 and 18 storeys seems inconsistent. There are many more sites on the K2K corridor that are predominately commercialised zones and may even border on being considered industrial that have been omitted for consideration. Also 17 to 18 stories along a corridor that will be serviced by a light rail and buses that compete with private automobile traffic with only two lanes in each direction does seems excessive. Should we not see how the current system performs first, why is there are rush to push this through? This type of development seems fitting around a train station, not light rail stations. Will the pedestrians on the footpaths be protected along Anzac Parade? With only two lanes now in each direction the cars and buses are coming extremely close to the footpaths, in some areas the footpaths are now narrower due to the light rail, and the volume of pedestrians in this areas is high, particularly in Kingsford around the university. To ensure fairness and transparency and a sustainable environment all sites along Anzac Parade should be limited to the same height. Perhaps an agreement can be reached that some sites could be uniformly increased to 12 or 14 storeys based on clear criteria of excellence being met. The criteria of excellence should be first agreed which would include community consultation. The criteria of excellence should then be made public and then everyone has the opportunity to submit development applications. This would lead to an increase in the quality of all developments in the town centres, not just for pre-selected nodes, that may give the impression to be developer driven for profit. on Facebook Share Why are nine pre-selected sites able to go 17 or 18 storeys whilst the properties adjacent can only go to nine? There are many strategic locations along Anzac Parade that have not had the opportunity to be considered for 17 or 18 storeys. The council’s comment in deciding on the opportunity sites in the information sheet that can go to 17 and 18 storeys seems inconsistent. There are many more sites on the K2K corridor that are predominately commercialised zones and may even border on being considered industrial that have been omitted for consideration. Also 17 to 18 stories along a corridor that will be serviced by a light rail and buses that compete with private automobile traffic with only two lanes in each direction does seems excessive. Should we not see how the current system performs first, why is there are rush to push this through? This type of development seems fitting around a train station, not light rail stations. Will the pedestrians on the footpaths be protected along Anzac Parade? With only two lanes now in each direction the cars and buses are coming extremely close to the footpaths, in some areas the footpaths are now narrower due to the light rail, and the volume of pedestrians in this areas is high, particularly in Kingsford around the university. To ensure fairness and transparency and a sustainable environment all sites along Anzac Parade should be limited to the same height. Perhaps an agreement can be reached that some sites could be uniformly increased to 12 or 14 storeys based on clear criteria of excellence being met. The criteria of excellence should be first agreed which would include community consultation. The criteria of excellence should then be made public and then everyone has the opportunity to submit development applications. This would lead to an increase in the quality of all developments in the town centres, not just for pre-selected nodes, that may give the impression to be developer driven for profit. on Twitter Share Why are nine pre-selected sites able to go 17 or 18 storeys whilst the properties adjacent can only go to nine? There are many strategic locations along Anzac Parade that have not had the opportunity to be considered for 17 or 18 storeys. The council’s comment in deciding on the opportunity sites in the information sheet that can go to 17 and 18 storeys seems inconsistent. There are many more sites on the K2K corridor that are predominately commercialised zones and may even border on being considered industrial that have been omitted for consideration. Also 17 to 18 stories along a corridor that will be serviced by a light rail and buses that compete with private automobile traffic with only two lanes in each direction does seems excessive. Should we not see how the current system performs first, why is there are rush to push this through? This type of development seems fitting around a train station, not light rail stations. Will the pedestrians on the footpaths be protected along Anzac Parade? With only two lanes now in each direction the cars and buses are coming extremely close to the footpaths, in some areas the footpaths are now narrower due to the light rail, and the volume of pedestrians in this areas is high, particularly in Kingsford around the university. To ensure fairness and transparency and a sustainable environment all sites along Anzac Parade should be limited to the same height. Perhaps an agreement can be reached that some sites could be uniformly increased to 12 or 14 storeys based on clear criteria of excellence being met. The criteria of excellence should be first agreed which would include community consultation. The criteria of excellence should then be made public and then everyone has the opportunity to submit development applications. This would lead to an increase in the quality of all developments in the town centres, not just for pre-selected nodes, that may give the impression to be developer driven for profit. on Linkedin Email Why are nine pre-selected sites able to go 17 or 18 storeys whilst the properties adjacent can only go to nine? There are many strategic locations along Anzac Parade that have not had the opportunity to be considered for 17 or 18 storeys. The council’s comment in deciding on the opportunity sites in the information sheet that can go to 17 and 18 storeys seems inconsistent. There are many more sites on the K2K corridor that are predominately commercialised zones and may even border on being considered industrial that have been omitted for consideration. Also 17 to 18 stories along a corridor that will be serviced by a light rail and buses that compete with private automobile traffic with only two lanes in each direction does seems excessive. Should we not see how the current system performs first, why is there are rush to push this through? This type of development seems fitting around a train station, not light rail stations. Will the pedestrians on the footpaths be protected along Anzac Parade? With only two lanes now in each direction the cars and buses are coming extremely close to the footpaths, in some areas the footpaths are now narrower due to the light rail, and the volume of pedestrians in this areas is high, particularly in Kingsford around the university. To ensure fairness and transparency and a sustainable environment all sites along Anzac Parade should be limited to the same height. Perhaps an agreement can be reached that some sites could be uniformly increased to 12 or 14 storeys based on clear criteria of excellence being met. The criteria of excellence should be first agreed which would include community consultation. The criteria of excellence should then be made public and then everyone has the opportunity to submit development applications. This would lead to an increase in the quality of all developments in the town centres, not just for pre-selected nodes, that may give the impression to be developer driven for profit. link

    Why are nine pre-selected sites able to go 17 or 18 storeys whilst the properties adjacent can only go to nine? There are many strategic locations along Anzac Parade that have not had the opportunity to be considered for 17 or 18 storeys. The council’s comment in deciding on the opportunity sites in the information sheet that can go to 17 and 18 storeys seems inconsistent. There are many more sites on the K2K corridor that are predominately commercialised zones and may even border on being considered industrial that have been omitted for consideration. Also 17 to 18 stories along a corridor that will be serviced by a light rail and buses that compete with private automobile traffic with only two lanes in each direction does seems excessive. Should we not see how the current system performs first, why is there are rush to push this through? This type of development seems fitting around a train station, not light rail stations. Will the pedestrians on the footpaths be protected along Anzac Parade? With only two lanes now in each direction the cars and buses are coming extremely close to the footpaths, in some areas the footpaths are now narrower due to the light rail, and the volume of pedestrians in this areas is high, particularly in Kingsford around the university. To ensure fairness and transparency and a sustainable environment all sites along Anzac Parade should be limited to the same height. Perhaps an agreement can be reached that some sites could be uniformly increased to 12 or 14 storeys based on clear criteria of excellence being met. The criteria of excellence should be first agreed which would include community consultation. The criteria of excellence should then be made public and then everyone has the opportunity to submit development applications. This would lead to an increase in the quality of all developments in the town centres, not just for pre-selected nodes, that may give the impression to be developer driven for profit.

    RSA asked over 4 years ago

    Thanks for your question. 

    The proposed height and density controls for the entire corridor are underpinned by design principles set out in the draft Planning Strategy, see Appendix 1a: Planning Strategy - Part 1 of 2, page 49. These principles were informed by the international urban design competition held in 2016 and consideration of projected in residential and employment growth. Following the competition, Council engaged urban design consultants to undertake a more detailed analysis and review of appropriate built form controls for each block in Kensington and Kingsford taking into account impacts on nearby development, achieving good design and public benefits. The review established that mid-rise building would provide for a more human scale for the precinct, with higher, more slender buildings being located at key intersections where they act to create distinctive urban form and facilitate growth around light rail infrastructure. 
    See Appendix 1a: Planning Strategy - Part 1 of 2 , page 48-57 for further information.

    In relation to footpaths, Council has proposed that new buildings must provide minimum 2.5m setback from the front of each block. This will widen the existing footpath and over time will make a continuous, wider footpath along the length of Anzac Parade.

    Part of the draft Strategy includes a Design Excellence policy which relates to the key node sites and allows an increase in height provided they undergo a competitive design excellence process. A new Development Control Plan (DCP) for the two centres will require development applications within the K2K boundary to demonstrate that they can achieve high standards of design and amenity and this will be subject to further community consultation in early 2020.


  • Share Hi - Has a draft DCP been developed. If yes, can you direct me to it. If no, would you have any idea to timing. Thank you on Facebook Share Hi - Has a draft DCP been developed. If yes, can you direct me to it. If no, would you have any idea to timing. Thank you on Twitter Share Hi - Has a draft DCP been developed. If yes, can you direct me to it. If no, would you have any idea to timing. Thank you on Linkedin Email Hi - Has a draft DCP been developed. If yes, can you direct me to it. If no, would you have any idea to timing. Thank you link

    Hi - Has a draft DCP been developed. If yes, can you direct me to it. If no, would you have any idea to timing. Thank you

    Eugene asked over 4 years ago

    Hi, thanks for commenting on the strategy.  Council is in the early stages of preparing a Development Control Plan (DCP) for the two centres which will contain more detailed controls for new development in the K2K corridor. The DCP will need to complement and support the legislative provisions contained in Council’s LEP and therefore will be finalised after Council’s decision on the exhibited Planning Proposal.  The draft DCP will be subject to further community consultation in early 2020.


  • Share I am afraid you are double dipping in the light rail! Is the light rail going to offset the number of cars on Anzac Parade currently or increase public transport capacity for new high rise buildings? ... I dont feel the light rail has the capacity to solve both problems! I wouldn't dismiss the proposal by JT3 (and it can be done as part of town planning) ... all it needs for the council to act FAST in testing the light rail and stay ahead of commercial development. on Facebook Share I am afraid you are double dipping in the light rail! Is the light rail going to offset the number of cars on Anzac Parade currently or increase public transport capacity for new high rise buildings? ... I dont feel the light rail has the capacity to solve both problems! I wouldn't dismiss the proposal by JT3 (and it can be done as part of town planning) ... all it needs for the council to act FAST in testing the light rail and stay ahead of commercial development. on Twitter Share I am afraid you are double dipping in the light rail! Is the light rail going to offset the number of cars on Anzac Parade currently or increase public transport capacity for new high rise buildings? ... I dont feel the light rail has the capacity to solve both problems! I wouldn't dismiss the proposal by JT3 (and it can be done as part of town planning) ... all it needs for the council to act FAST in testing the light rail and stay ahead of commercial development. on Linkedin Email I am afraid you are double dipping in the light rail! Is the light rail going to offset the number of cars on Anzac Parade currently or increase public transport capacity for new high rise buildings? ... I dont feel the light rail has the capacity to solve both problems! I wouldn't dismiss the proposal by JT3 (and it can be done as part of town planning) ... all it needs for the council to act FAST in testing the light rail and stay ahead of commercial development. link

    I am afraid you are double dipping in the light rail! Is the light rail going to offset the number of cars on Anzac Parade currently or increase public transport capacity for new high rise buildings? ... I dont feel the light rail has the capacity to solve both problems! I wouldn't dismiss the proposal by JT3 (and it can be done as part of town planning) ... all it needs for the council to act FAST in testing the light rail and stay ahead of commercial development.

    Maroubra_Man asked over 4 years ago

    Hi, thanks for your question.

    In relation to the capacity of the light rail, advice provided by Council’s transport consultant is that public transport capacity can be met if the light rail together with buses continue to service the transport needs of the precinct. Transport for NSW (TfNSW) has advised that all express buses and some of the existing buses to the City from the east and south will be maintained and that the bus network will be scalable and flexible to respond to demand as the need arises. When open, the light rail will have 15 services/hour. This can increase to 20 services per hour with a 6 minute intervals.

    In the longer term, the transport analysis recommended that additional transport capacity would likely be required in the form of new mass transit and additional bus services. Council will continue to advocate for improvements to public transport including mass transport to meet the needs of the community in line with the 30 minute City direction in the Greater Sydney Region Plan – Metropolis of Three Cities.


  • Share I am a property owner in Forsyth Street and I am very concerned about the prospect of a 16 story and several 9 story monolith's being constructed at the end of my street. What will the impact be to this otherwise peaceful streetscape and community ? How does council intend to mitigate the dislocation and disruption that will be the inevitable consequence of such short sightedness. What is council doing to mitigate the noise and traffic flow that will disrupt the lives of all residents ? Do they intend to make Forsyth a cul-de-sac or a one way street perhaps or as is more likely do the council intend squandering our rates on more unsolicited propaganda ? on Facebook Share I am a property owner in Forsyth Street and I am very concerned about the prospect of a 16 story and several 9 story monolith's being constructed at the end of my street. What will the impact be to this otherwise peaceful streetscape and community ? How does council intend to mitigate the dislocation and disruption that will be the inevitable consequence of such short sightedness. What is council doing to mitigate the noise and traffic flow that will disrupt the lives of all residents ? Do they intend to make Forsyth a cul-de-sac or a one way street perhaps or as is more likely do the council intend squandering our rates on more unsolicited propaganda ? on Twitter Share I am a property owner in Forsyth Street and I am very concerned about the prospect of a 16 story and several 9 story monolith's being constructed at the end of my street. What will the impact be to this otherwise peaceful streetscape and community ? How does council intend to mitigate the dislocation and disruption that will be the inevitable consequence of such short sightedness. What is council doing to mitigate the noise and traffic flow that will disrupt the lives of all residents ? Do they intend to make Forsyth a cul-de-sac or a one way street perhaps or as is more likely do the council intend squandering our rates on more unsolicited propaganda ? on Linkedin Email I am a property owner in Forsyth Street and I am very concerned about the prospect of a 16 story and several 9 story monolith's being constructed at the end of my street. What will the impact be to this otherwise peaceful streetscape and community ? How does council intend to mitigate the dislocation and disruption that will be the inevitable consequence of such short sightedness. What is council doing to mitigate the noise and traffic flow that will disrupt the lives of all residents ? Do they intend to make Forsyth a cul-de-sac or a one way street perhaps or as is more likely do the council intend squandering our rates on more unsolicited propaganda ? link

    I am a property owner in Forsyth Street and I am very concerned about the prospect of a 16 story and several 9 story monolith's being constructed at the end of my street. What will the impact be to this otherwise peaceful streetscape and community ? How does council intend to mitigate the dislocation and disruption that will be the inevitable consequence of such short sightedness. What is council doing to mitigate the noise and traffic flow that will disrupt the lives of all residents ? Do they intend to make Forsyth a cul-de-sac or a one way street perhaps or as is more likely do the council intend squandering our rates on more unsolicited propaganda ?

    Peter Goodyear asked over 4 years ago

    Thank you for your questions. 

    The strategies and actions outlined in the draft proposal focus on improving the town centres by requiring a high standard of design excellence, creating new public spaces through the widening of footpaths (which will enable more opportunities for outdoor dining), new urban furniture, planting of significant trees along Anzac Parade, and introducing new urban plazas within the town centres, such as the Meeks Street Plaza which will function as a community focal point (see Section 8.0 Public Realm and Landscape in the Planning Strategy for more details). These improvements are intended to improve the streetscape, build a strong local character and sense of community.

    The traffic assessment report undertaken for Council as part of the K2K Strategy determined that the anticipated level of traffic from both residential  and commercial development can be accommodated in the precinct.  It is expected that there will be reduced reliance on cars as more residents and employees will use the light rail. Traffic modelling also concluded that the performance of key intersections can be addressed by undertaking design improvements to reduce delays. In regards to traffic along Forsyth Street, currently no plans are in place to make Forsyth Street one way however Council will continue to monitor traffic volumes and intersection performances to determine future traffic management measures.


  • Share Is council stipulating or enforcing the requirement that any (new) high rise developments fronting Anzac Parade must have at least 2-3 floors of retail/commercial space? I agree with the general sentiment that the current shops and vibe for Kingsford and Kensington is quite woeful (Kenso being worse). We need some lifeblood injected into the area. I think the thing to do it will be a few major anchor tenants like Woolworths, Coles and/or Aldi. If they can find a space large enough to be viable, they will attract other businesses to set up shop in the vicinity. God knows we need something better than the current IGA. Also, whilst I understand the quid pro quo for more apartments to pay for the light rail, I am a little disheartened by the unchecked, tsunami of boarding houses in the area. Something has to be done to stop the rampant proliferation of these sorts of developments all over the place - even in quieter off streets. They are very quickly changing the fabric and constitution of the area. There was a mention of making Anzac Pde an attractive boulevard. I can't agree more with the need to focus on getting it right (NOW). We CAN turn around the area and this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to do so. How can we make it attractive? More trees, more upmarket shops, nice lighting, wider footpaths and building setbacks, rigorous standards for new developments and the policing of their aesthetic qualities. There are some butt ugly buildings in Kingsford especially. Let's not make those mistakes again pleeease!!! on Facebook Share Is council stipulating or enforcing the requirement that any (new) high rise developments fronting Anzac Parade must have at least 2-3 floors of retail/commercial space? I agree with the general sentiment that the current shops and vibe for Kingsford and Kensington is quite woeful (Kenso being worse). We need some lifeblood injected into the area. I think the thing to do it will be a few major anchor tenants like Woolworths, Coles and/or Aldi. If they can find a space large enough to be viable, they will attract other businesses to set up shop in the vicinity. God knows we need something better than the current IGA. Also, whilst I understand the quid pro quo for more apartments to pay for the light rail, I am a little disheartened by the unchecked, tsunami of boarding houses in the area. Something has to be done to stop the rampant proliferation of these sorts of developments all over the place - even in quieter off streets. They are very quickly changing the fabric and constitution of the area. There was a mention of making Anzac Pde an attractive boulevard. I can't agree more with the need to focus on getting it right (NOW). We CAN turn around the area and this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to do so. How can we make it attractive? More trees, more upmarket shops, nice lighting, wider footpaths and building setbacks, rigorous standards for new developments and the policing of their aesthetic qualities. There are some butt ugly buildings in Kingsford especially. Let's not make those mistakes again pleeease!!! on Twitter Share Is council stipulating or enforcing the requirement that any (new) high rise developments fronting Anzac Parade must have at least 2-3 floors of retail/commercial space? I agree with the general sentiment that the current shops and vibe for Kingsford and Kensington is quite woeful (Kenso being worse). We need some lifeblood injected into the area. I think the thing to do it will be a few major anchor tenants like Woolworths, Coles and/or Aldi. If they can find a space large enough to be viable, they will attract other businesses to set up shop in the vicinity. God knows we need something better than the current IGA. Also, whilst I understand the quid pro quo for more apartments to pay for the light rail, I am a little disheartened by the unchecked, tsunami of boarding houses in the area. Something has to be done to stop the rampant proliferation of these sorts of developments all over the place - even in quieter off streets. They are very quickly changing the fabric and constitution of the area. There was a mention of making Anzac Pde an attractive boulevard. I can't agree more with the need to focus on getting it right (NOW). We CAN turn around the area and this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to do so. How can we make it attractive? More trees, more upmarket shops, nice lighting, wider footpaths and building setbacks, rigorous standards for new developments and the policing of their aesthetic qualities. There are some butt ugly buildings in Kingsford especially. Let's not make those mistakes again pleeease!!! on Linkedin Email Is council stipulating or enforcing the requirement that any (new) high rise developments fronting Anzac Parade must have at least 2-3 floors of retail/commercial space? I agree with the general sentiment that the current shops and vibe for Kingsford and Kensington is quite woeful (Kenso being worse). We need some lifeblood injected into the area. I think the thing to do it will be a few major anchor tenants like Woolworths, Coles and/or Aldi. If they can find a space large enough to be viable, they will attract other businesses to set up shop in the vicinity. God knows we need something better than the current IGA. Also, whilst I understand the quid pro quo for more apartments to pay for the light rail, I am a little disheartened by the unchecked, tsunami of boarding houses in the area. Something has to be done to stop the rampant proliferation of these sorts of developments all over the place - even in quieter off streets. They are very quickly changing the fabric and constitution of the area. There was a mention of making Anzac Pde an attractive boulevard. I can't agree more with the need to focus on getting it right (NOW). We CAN turn around the area and this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to do so. How can we make it attractive? More trees, more upmarket shops, nice lighting, wider footpaths and building setbacks, rigorous standards for new developments and the policing of their aesthetic qualities. There are some butt ugly buildings in Kingsford especially. Let's not make those mistakes again pleeease!!! link

    Is council stipulating or enforcing the requirement that any (new) high rise developments fronting Anzac Parade must have at least 2-3 floors of retail/commercial space? I agree with the general sentiment that the current shops and vibe for Kingsford and Kensington is quite woeful (Kenso being worse). We need some lifeblood injected into the area. I think the thing to do it will be a few major anchor tenants like Woolworths, Coles and/or Aldi. If they can find a space large enough to be viable, they will attract other businesses to set up shop in the vicinity. God knows we need something better than the current IGA. Also, whilst I understand the quid pro quo for more apartments to pay for the light rail, I am a little disheartened by the unchecked, tsunami of boarding houses in the area. Something has to be done to stop the rampant proliferation of these sorts of developments all over the place - even in quieter off streets. They are very quickly changing the fabric and constitution of the area. There was a mention of making Anzac Pde an attractive boulevard. I can't agree more with the need to focus on getting it right (NOW). We CAN turn around the area and this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to do so. How can we make it attractive? More trees, more upmarket shops, nice lighting, wider footpaths and building setbacks, rigorous standards for new developments and the policing of their aesthetic qualities. There are some butt ugly buildings in Kingsford especially. Let's not make those mistakes again pleeease!!!

    luism asked over 4 years ago

    The Strategy proposes a minimum quantity of commercial floor space in the Randwick Local Environmental Plan (RLEP) which will apply to the key nodes of Todman Square, Kingsford Midtown and Kingsford Junction Precincts. These areas are identified in the Kensington and Kingsford town centre commercial floor space ratio maps on page 46 of the Strategy.

    In addition, the Strategy proposes a requirement that buildings have active frontages to all ground floor spaces so they can be open to the street and have visual engagement with pedestrians. This will improve the amenity of the precinct, support viability and security. It is also proposed to amend the Randwick Development Control Plan 2013 to encourage retail and commercial uses to address laneways and secondary streets. Please see the Kensington and Kingsford Town Centre active frontages maps on page 45 of the Strategy.

    Further information can be found in Section 4.4 Commercial Floor Space and Jobs Growth of the Strategy.

    Public domain changes will be funded and implemented through a community infrastructure clause (CIC) and draft 7.12 Contrbutions Plan (also currently on exhibition). The community infrastructure clause will apply to all land within the Kensington and Kingsford town centres. The intended effect of the CIC is to allow for additional building heights and density (from the existing requirement in the RLEP 2012) within the Kensington and Kingsford town centres if the development provides community infrastructure (see appendix 3b Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres - Community Infrastructure Contribution - Development Guidelines for further details).

    The draft 7.12 Contributions Plan requires a monetary payment based on the cost of carrying out development. The contribution will apply as a condition of development consent or a complying development certificate if the cost of the works exceeds $100,000. The maximum levy is 3% for works over $250,000.

    Boarding houses are a permissible use in the B2 Local Centre Zone and like all proposals in the corridor, will be required to achieve a high standard of design excellence including built form, ground level public realm improvements, sustainability initiatives, active street frontages and wider footpaths, to meet the design principles and the vision set out in the draft Strategy.


  • Share The proposal look pretty good, I hope it transforms Anzac Parade for the better. Am I right that there is no planned review of development heights surrounding the Carlton St light rail stop? on Facebook Share The proposal look pretty good, I hope it transforms Anzac Parade for the better. Am I right that there is no planned review of development heights surrounding the Carlton St light rail stop? on Twitter Share The proposal look pretty good, I hope it transforms Anzac Parade for the better. Am I right that there is no planned review of development heights surrounding the Carlton St light rail stop? on Linkedin Email The proposal look pretty good, I hope it transforms Anzac Parade for the better. Am I right that there is no planned review of development heights surrounding the Carlton St light rail stop? link

    The proposal look pretty good, I hope it transforms Anzac Parade for the better. Am I right that there is no planned review of development heights surrounding the Carlton St light rail stop?

    San asked over 4 years ago

    Thank you for your feedback. In answer to your question regarding properties surrounding the Carlton Street light rail stop:

    The review relates to the land currently zoned B2 Local Centre within the Kensington and Kingsford town centres and three additional sites in Kingsford which form a minor boundary extension to the Kingsford Town Centre.

    In relation to properties adjacent to the Carlton Street light rail stop, the properties within the B2 zone adjacent to the stop were subject to review (as part of the K2K draft Strategy) and subsequently Council is proposing a height increase up to a maximum of 9 storeys and an allowable Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 4:1 at the sites. The properties surrounding the Carlton Street stop which fall outside the B2 zone have not been included in this review.

    More information relating to the exact boundaries of the review can be found using the Interactive Map on Council’s ‘Your Say’ website using the link below:

    https://randwick-council.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=fde7ec24913e4dfcb844477abb6f9c17

    Please do not hesitate to get in touch if you have any further questions.

    Regards

    Randwick City Council

  • Share Under the proposed plan, are the new high rise buildings required to provide sufficient parking facilities for tenant and visitors? If so, where would the requirements be captured in the proposal? on Facebook Share Under the proposed plan, are the new high rise buildings required to provide sufficient parking facilities for tenant and visitors? If so, where would the requirements be captured in the proposal? on Twitter Share Under the proposed plan, are the new high rise buildings required to provide sufficient parking facilities for tenant and visitors? If so, where would the requirements be captured in the proposal? on Linkedin Email Under the proposed plan, are the new high rise buildings required to provide sufficient parking facilities for tenant and visitors? If so, where would the requirements be captured in the proposal? link

    Under the proposed plan, are the new high rise buildings required to provide sufficient parking facilities for tenant and visitors? If so, where would the requirements be captured in the proposal?

    https://www.yoursay.randwick.nsw.gov.au/k2k?tool=qanda#tool_tab asked over 4 years ago

    Thank you for your question. The K2K plan includes provisions that require new development to have parking. For example, a studio will have no minimum requirement but a 3 bedroom flat will need to provide a minimum of 1.1 spaces per dwelling and no more than 1.4 spaces per dwelling. Part C section 7.11 of the K2K Planning Strategy contains an explanation of the provisions and a table showing the proposed minimum and maximum parking requirements.  These new requirements will be contained in a draft development control plan for the town centres along with other planning and design controls which will be subject to further community consultation in early 2020.


  • Share Is it true that these new buildings will have NO car parking spaces? on Facebook Share Is it true that these new buildings will have NO car parking spaces? on Twitter Share Is it true that these new buildings will have NO car parking spaces? on Linkedin Email Is it true that these new buildings will have NO car parking spaces? link

    Is it true that these new buildings will have NO car parking spaces?

    Vonnie asked over 4 years ago

    No that is not correct. A new set of parking standards, which is a reduction on Council’s existing controls, have been recommended to apply to future development proposals in the town centres depending on the mix of apartment types and commercial floor space. For example, a studio will have no minimum requirement but a 3 bedroom flat will need to provide a minimum of 1.1 spaces per dwelling and no more than 1.4 spaces per dwelling. Part C section 7.11 of the K2K Planning Strategy contains an explanation of the provisions and a table showing the proposed minimum and maximum parking requirements.  These new requirements will be contained in a draft development control plan for the town centres along with other planning and design controls which will be subject to further community consultation in early 2020.

    Suggested car parking requirements contained in the draft Strategy were developed by consultants following modelling of parking and traffic impacts of the proposed changes to planning controls, road changes, footpath widening and traffic movements. The analysis also suggested increased bicycle and motorcycle parking and increased car share vehicle spaces given the improved connectivity and improved public transport servicing which is expected to reduce future reliance on private vehicle ownership.

  • Share It is good to see the council is city planning ahead of commercial development (The Kensington and Kingsford Planning Proposal (K2K)). The congestion in K2K area is starving the further away suburbs in this council like Maroubra, Little Bay ... etc What are you doing to make sure that we are not seeing further delays in travel time to the CBD? on Facebook Share It is good to see the council is city planning ahead of commercial development (The Kensington and Kingsford Planning Proposal (K2K)). The congestion in K2K area is starving the further away suburbs in this council like Maroubra, Little Bay ... etc What are you doing to make sure that we are not seeing further delays in travel time to the CBD? on Twitter Share It is good to see the council is city planning ahead of commercial development (The Kensington and Kingsford Planning Proposal (K2K)). The congestion in K2K area is starving the further away suburbs in this council like Maroubra, Little Bay ... etc What are you doing to make sure that we are not seeing further delays in travel time to the CBD? on Linkedin Email It is good to see the council is city planning ahead of commercial development (The Kensington and Kingsford Planning Proposal (K2K)). The congestion in K2K area is starving the further away suburbs in this council like Maroubra, Little Bay ... etc What are you doing to make sure that we are not seeing further delays in travel time to the CBD? link

    It is good to see the council is city planning ahead of commercial development (The Kensington and Kingsford Planning Proposal (K2K)). The congestion in K2K area is starving the further away suburbs in this council like Maroubra, Little Bay ... etc What are you doing to make sure that we are not seeing further delays in travel time to the CBD?

    Maroubra_Man asked over 4 years ago

    Hi, thanks for your question! The traffic assessment report undertaken for Council as part of the K2K Strategy determined that the anticipated level of traffic from both residential  and commercial development should be able to be accommodated in the precinct.  It is expected that there will be reduced reliance on cars as more residents and employees will use the light rail. Traffic modelling also concluded that the performance of key intersections can be addressed by undertaking design improvements to reduce delays.

    In relation to the capacity of the light rail, advice provided by Council’s transport consultant is that public transport capacity can be met if the light rail together with buses continue to service the transport needs of the precinct. Transport for NSW (TfNSW) has advised that all express buses and some of the existing buses to the City from the east and south will be maintained and that the bus network will be scalable and flexible to respond to demand as the need arises. When open, the light rail will have 15 services/hour. This can increase to 20 services per hour with a 6 minute intervals. In the longer term, the transport analysis recommended that additional transport capacity would likely be required in the form of new mass transit and additional bus services. Council will continue to advocate for improvements to public transport including mass transport to meet the needs of the community in line with the 30 minute City direction in the Greater Sydney Region Plan – Metropolis of Three Cities.

  • Share The proposals involve a large increase in density and population. It would make sense to allow the light rail to commence operation, and see how much capacity there is for existing residents, before new buildings are planned. Currently, during the morning peak hour, the buses to the city are frequently full, and cannot pick up passengers on Anzac Parade Kensington. It is likely that the light rail will also be at capacity during peak hour. It would make sense to wait and see before new plans are made. The Kingsford light rail is due to commence in March 2020, why must this be decided before then? on Facebook Share The proposals involve a large increase in density and population. It would make sense to allow the light rail to commence operation, and see how much capacity there is for existing residents, before new buildings are planned. Currently, during the morning peak hour, the buses to the city are frequently full, and cannot pick up passengers on Anzac Parade Kensington. It is likely that the light rail will also be at capacity during peak hour. It would make sense to wait and see before new plans are made. The Kingsford light rail is due to commence in March 2020, why must this be decided before then? on Twitter Share The proposals involve a large increase in density and population. It would make sense to allow the light rail to commence operation, and see how much capacity there is for existing residents, before new buildings are planned. Currently, during the morning peak hour, the buses to the city are frequently full, and cannot pick up passengers on Anzac Parade Kensington. It is likely that the light rail will also be at capacity during peak hour. It would make sense to wait and see before new plans are made. The Kingsford light rail is due to commence in March 2020, why must this be decided before then? on Linkedin Email The proposals involve a large increase in density and population. It would make sense to allow the light rail to commence operation, and see how much capacity there is for existing residents, before new buildings are planned. Currently, during the morning peak hour, the buses to the city are frequently full, and cannot pick up passengers on Anzac Parade Kensington. It is likely that the light rail will also be at capacity during peak hour. It would make sense to wait and see before new plans are made. The Kingsford light rail is due to commence in March 2020, why must this be decided before then? link

    The proposals involve a large increase in density and population. It would make sense to allow the light rail to commence operation, and see how much capacity there is for existing residents, before new buildings are planned. Currently, during the morning peak hour, the buses to the city are frequently full, and cannot pick up passengers on Anzac Parade Kensington. It is likely that the light rail will also be at capacity during peak hour. It would make sense to wait and see before new plans are made. The Kingsford light rail is due to commence in March 2020, why must this be decided before then?

    JT3 asked over 4 years ago

    Hi, thanks for your question. We think it's important to manage the strategic planning process for the two town centres so that we can achieve the community character and public benefits that Kingsford and Kensington deseve.. The alternative scenario of developer led, unsolicited planning proposals is likely to result in a piecemeal outcome, taller buildings along Anzac Parade and lost opportunity to achieve community and public benefits. 

    If the planning changes are endorsed by Council, developments are unlikely to commence in the corridor prior to 2021, in which time the light rail will have been running.

    The traffic assessment report undertaken for Council as part of the K2K Strategy determined that the anticipated level of traffic from both residential  and commercial development should be able to be accommodated in the precinct.  It is expected that there will be reduced reliance on cars as more residents and employees will use the light rail. Traffic modelling also concluded that the performance of key intersections can be addressed by undertaking design improvements to reduce delays.

    In relation to the capacity of the light rail, advice provided by Council’s transport consultant is that public transport capacity can be met if the light rail together with buses continue to service the transport needs of the precinct. Transport for NSW (TfNSW) has advised that all express buses and some of the existing buses to the City from the east and south will be maintained and that the bus network will be scalable and flexible to respond to demand as the need arises. When open, the light rail will have 15 services/hour. This can increase to 20 services per hour with a 6 minute intervals. In the longer term, the transport analysis recommended that additional transport capacity would likely be required in the form of new mass transit and additional bus services. Council will continue to advocate for improvements to public transport including mass transport to meet the needs of the community in line with the 30 minute City direction in the Greater Sydney Region Plan – Metropolis of Three Cities.